Khaos
03-14-2007, 11:14 PM
Any evaluations on this AFKeeker would be very welcome. I suggest a sizeable amount of incompetance and ignorance coupled with lack of intellectual ability. This is THE KEEKER SYNDROME
Episode 1 of the Keeker Sydrome: The beginning:
an extract from a conversation with trema and AFKeeker
Trema: oh well afkeeker, your stupidity has been proved and do***ented
Trema: 1
Trema: 2
AFKeeker: why does it have to be only those answers?
Trema: 3
AFKeeker: does that not answer your question?
Trema: still not a yes/no present
Trema: 4
AFKeeker: i would oppose you by saying that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit.
Trema: 5
Trema: 6
Trema: 7
Trema: 8
Trema: 9
AFKeeker: the truth is that you're just trying to frustrate me.
Trema: 10
Trema: you have 10 seconds to answer the yes/no question, or is this too hard for you?
Trema: do not lie to these people, can you not handle the truth?
AFKeeker: i answered the question directly, with more detail than a simply 1 word answer.
Trema: the fact you cannot see the proof is proof enough mister
Trema: don't take these kind observers for fools, you have answered all "but" the question
AFKeeker: and what proof is that?
AFKeeker: you say inability, i say going above and beyond, i guess it's just semantics.
Trema: i have proven your stupidity *bows*
AFKeeker: because you've been too forceful, and tipped your hand
Trema: no manipulation is neccessary, you are proving your simple mindedness by showing the inability to answer a yes/no question
AFKeeker: in this case, you aren't going to get me to give you your desired answer
AFKeeker: when you give an order, you get immediate reactance against it. it's just a question of how strong that reactance is.
AFKeeker: it only works when you can get the person to make it their decision, not you telling them what to do.
AFKeeker: you see, you're being too forceful with your manipulation
Trema: so you are saying you would oppose me making such a post? /yes/no
AFKeeker: notice the phrase "you would oppose" and "i would oppose" in those quotes.
AFKeeker: "you have at no point said you would oppose" "that is how i would oppose you."
Trema: use your brain keeker, that's what it is meant for
Trema: you have at no point said you would oppose, you commented on what you may oppose "with"
AFKeeker: "that is how i would oppose you." is what i said
AFKeeker: your question was whether or not i would oppose you making said post. i said i would. how have i not answered?
Trema: well i'm sorry but your brain still hasn't got round to answering my question
AFKeeker: i'm sorry, i like to be a little more articulate than simple yes's or no's.
Trema: it is a yes/no question, read the question mister
AFKeeker: and i answered it with "afkeeker: i would say that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit." that is how i would oppose you.
Trema: it is a yes or no question
Trema: i asked you a question mister
AFKeeker: but, when have you ever taken anything i say seriously?
AFKeeker: i would say that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit.
Trema: you would oppose me making a post rebuking what you have said?
AFKeeker: i would claim to have a basic working knowledge, yes, but i assume you're going to rebuke anything i claim anyway.
Trema: you*
Trema: ou ai project, you
Trema: can you do***ent this? i will only accept do***ents notarized by my attorney, and signed by you in blood. besides, you don't really exist anyway
Episode 1 of the Keeker Sydrome: The beginning:
an extract from a conversation with trema and AFKeeker
Trema: oh well afkeeker, your stupidity has been proved and do***ented
Trema: 1
Trema: 2
AFKeeker: why does it have to be only those answers?
Trema: 3
AFKeeker: does that not answer your question?
Trema: still not a yes/no present
Trema: 4
AFKeeker: i would oppose you by saying that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit.
Trema: 5
Trema: 6
Trema: 7
Trema: 8
Trema: 9
AFKeeker: the truth is that you're just trying to frustrate me.
Trema: 10
Trema: you have 10 seconds to answer the yes/no question, or is this too hard for you?
Trema: do not lie to these people, can you not handle the truth?
AFKeeker: i answered the question directly, with more detail than a simply 1 word answer.
Trema: the fact you cannot see the proof is proof enough mister
Trema: don't take these kind observers for fools, you have answered all "but" the question
AFKeeker: and what proof is that?
AFKeeker: you say inability, i say going above and beyond, i guess it's just semantics.
Trema: i have proven your stupidity *bows*
AFKeeker: because you've been too forceful, and tipped your hand
Trema: no manipulation is neccessary, you are proving your simple mindedness by showing the inability to answer a yes/no question
AFKeeker: in this case, you aren't going to get me to give you your desired answer
AFKeeker: when you give an order, you get immediate reactance against it. it's just a question of how strong that reactance is.
AFKeeker: it only works when you can get the person to make it their decision, not you telling them what to do.
AFKeeker: you see, you're being too forceful with your manipulation
Trema: so you are saying you would oppose me making such a post? /yes/no
AFKeeker: notice the phrase "you would oppose" and "i would oppose" in those quotes.
AFKeeker: "you have at no point said you would oppose" "that is how i would oppose you."
Trema: use your brain keeker, that's what it is meant for
Trema: you have at no point said you would oppose, you commented on what you may oppose "with"
AFKeeker: "that is how i would oppose you." is what i said
AFKeeker: your question was whether or not i would oppose you making said post. i said i would. how have i not answered?
Trema: well i'm sorry but your brain still hasn't got round to answering my question
AFKeeker: i'm sorry, i like to be a little more articulate than simple yes's or no's.
Trema: it is a yes/no question, read the question mister
AFKeeker: and i answered it with "afkeeker: i would say that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit." that is how i would oppose you.
Trema: it is a yes or no question
Trema: i asked you a question mister
AFKeeker: but, when have you ever taken anything i say seriously?
AFKeeker: i would say that my claim of having a basic working knowledge is completely legit.
Trema: you would oppose me making a post rebuking what you have said?
AFKeeker: i would claim to have a basic working knowledge, yes, but i assume you're going to rebuke anything i claim anyway.
Trema: you*
Trema: ou ai project, you
Trema: can you do***ent this? i will only accept do***ents notarized by my attorney, and signed by you in blood. besides, you don't really exist anyway